Google Directory - Society > Issues > Health > Tobacco > Advocacy > Pro-Tobacco > Critiques > Secondhand Smoke

Directory Help
Search only in Secondhand SmokeSearch the Web

Secondhand Smoke

Society > Issues > Health > Tobacco > Advocacy > Pro-Tobacco > Critiques > Secondhand Smoke

Go to Directory Home

Categories

News Coverage about Tobacco Industry Documents (2)

Related Categories:
Society > Issues > Health > Tobacco > Industry Critiques (57)
Society > Issues > Health > Tobacco > Secondhand Smoke (104)

Web Pages

Viewing in Google PageRank order View in alphabetical order

	TobaccoScam - http://www.tobaccoscam.ucsf.edu/ Covers the tobacco industry strategy of selling restaurants and bars the myth that smokefree laws will hurt them.
	Ventilation - http://www.no-smoke.org/getthefacts.php?dp=d20 Examines tobacco industry strategy to fight effective clean indoor air measures: ventilation.
	Tobacco Industry Opposition to Local Clean Indoor Air Policies - http://www.no-smoke.org/htmlpage.php?id=63 Report outlines tactics used by the industry to defeat local smokefree air ordinances.
	Tobacco Industry Manipulation of the Hospitality Industry to Maintain Smoking in Public pLaces - http://tc.bmjjournals.com/cgi/content/full/11/2/94 Research paper reviews internal industry documents, finds the tobacco industry created a myth of lost profits to fight smokefree public places.
	Tobacco's Secondhand Science of Smoke-Filled Rooms - http://www.prwatch.org/prwissues/2000Q3/secondhand.html PR Watch report on tobacco industry PR push to get the public to doubt the health effects of secondhand smoke; analyses industry tactics.

	How the Tobaccco Industry Responded to an Influential Study of the Health Effects of Secondhand Smoke - http://bmj.bmjjournals.com/cgi/content/full/325/7377/1413 Journal article documents how the tobacco industry generated a study and hid its involvement in an attempt to fight the emerging science on secondhand smoke.
	Tactics to Confuse The Science - http://oregon.gov/DHS/ph/tobacco/pubs.shtml Tobacco industry documents that show industry efforts to confuse or obscure the scientific discussion about the effects of tobacco.
	Disinfopedia: Freedom Organisation for the Right to Enjoy Smoking Tobacco - http://www.sourcewatch.org/wiki.phtml?title=FOREST Article on the pro-smoking group FOREST reveals that 96% of its funding comes from the tobacco industry.
	Tobacco, Lawyers, and Public Health - http://www.ajph.org/cgi/content/abstract/91/11/1749 Article in the American Journal of Public Health chronicles the efforts of the tobacco industry to attack the evidence that secondhand smoke causes disease.
	Tobacco, Lawyers, and Public Relations Firms - http://www.ajph.org/cgi/content/full/91/11/1749 Article in the American Journal of Public Health on Philip Morris's worldwide "sound science" program to set impossible standards of proof for the study of secondhand smoke.

	eBMJ -- Tobacco company set up network of sympathetic scientists - http://bmj.bmjjournals.com/cgi/content/full/316/7144/1553/d Britsh Medical Journal: "US tobacco giant Philip Morris set up a network of scientists throughout Europe who were paid to cast doubt on the risks of passive smoking and highlight other possible causes of respiratory problems, according to confidential documents from the company's law firm released on the Internet."
	Philip Morris Gave Secret Grants to Swedish Professor - http://www.nisus.se/archive/020610e.html Article about Swedish professor R. Rylander, accused of having secretely worked for the tobacco industry, sheds light on tobacco industry funding of research intended to create doubt about health effects.
	ASHRAE Standard 62: Tobacco Industry's Influence over National Ventilation Standards - http://tc.bmjjournals.com/cgi/content/full/11/4/315 Paper describes the history and role of the tobacco industry in the development of ventilation standards for indoor air quality by influencing the American Society of Heating, Refrigeration, and Air Conditioning Engineers (ASHRAE).
	Tobacco Industry Success in Preventing Regulation of Secondhand Smoke in Latin America - http://tc.bmjjournals.com/cgi/content/full/11/4/305 Research examines the tobacco industry's strategy to avoid regulations on secondhand smoke exposure in Latin America.
	Philip Morris's Secondhand Smoke Media Strategy - http://tobaccodocuments.org/landman/2023920090-0101.html Internal document from Philip Morris executive describes its strategies for fighting the EPA's scientific report on secondhand smoke, including "concentrating all the EPA's enemies against it".

	The Tobacco Industry's Response to the Passive Smoking Issue - http://www.quit.org.au/quit/FandI/fandi/c14s20.htm Report on tobacco industry activity analyzes industry interests in secondhand smoke, and shows the different strategies used by the industry to fight smokefree places.
	Are Cigarette Makers Trying to Conceal Secondhand Smoke? - http://www.pulmonaryreviews.com/dec00/pr_dec00_additives.html Article in medical journal examines the evidence that the tobacco industry is putting chemical additives to cigarettes to make secondhand smoke more pleasant but not less lethal.
	Project Whitecoat - http://www.globalink.org/tobacco/docs/secretdocs/whitecoat.shtml Review of tobacco industry documents on Project Whitecoat, a tobacco industry campaign to recruit scientific experts sympathetic to the industry.
	Global Conspiracy on Environmental Tobacco Smoke - http://www.tobaccofreedom.org/issues/documents/landman/conspiracy/ Presents a Philip Morris memo in which the company discusses its plans to "keep the controversy alive" on the health effects of secondhand smoke. The plans included a worldwide effort by the tobacco industry to recruit "friendly scientists".
	R.J. Reynolds chief: Smoking isn't addicting - http://www.cnn.com/US/9708/13/smoky.skies/ CEO of tobacco giant R. J. Reynolds testifies that smoking isn't addictive and secondhand smoke doesn't cause cancer.

	Philip Morris Sought Experts to Cloud Issue - http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/national/longterm/tobacco/stories/second.htm Washington Post article: "Tobacco giant Philip Morris systematically wooed scientists who might help the company counter the growing consensus on the health risks of secondhand tobacco smoke and 'keep the controversy alive,' according to a 1988 internal tobacco company document."
	Tobacco Science Wars - http://legacy.library.ucsf.edu/tid/hkn14e00 Article in Science reports the tobacco industry has been bullying scientists, according to researchers who lead the campaign against secondhand smoke.
	American Cancer Society Condemns Tobacco Industry Study for Inaccurate Use of Data - http://www.charitywire.com/charity6/03359.html Expose of study funded by the tobacco industry.
	Why Review Articles on the Health Effects of Passive Smoking Reach Different Conclusions - http://jama.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/abstract/279/19/1566?maxtoshow=&HITS=10&hits=10&RESULTFORMAT=&fulltext=Why+Review+Articles+on+the+Health+Effects+of+Passive+Smoking+Reach+Different+Conclusions&searchid=1067862394764_827&stored_search=&FIRSTINDEX=0&journalcode=jama Statistical analysis of the research literature on secondhand smoke finds "the only factor associated with concluding that passive smoking is not harmful was whether an author was affiliated with the tobacco industry".
	Enstrom Study - http://www.aaphp.org/bottle/2003/may20.htm Short item examines tobacco industry role in a study that concluded secondhand smoke is harmless.

	Tobacco Industry Influence on Air Quality Standards - http://apha.confex.com/apha/130am/techprogram/paper_45347.htm Paper discusses how and why the tobacco industry influences the setting of standards for indoor air quality.
	Blowing Smoke over Ventilation - http://www.businessweek.com/magazine/content/01_19/b3731089.htm BusinessWeek commentary outlines the tobacco industry strategy of "ventilation" and explains why it doesn't protect health.
	It's All Disinformation - http://www.s-t.com/daily/02-00/02-08-00/c04op082.htm Op-ed outlines history of tobacco industry attempts to influence public thinking about the science of secondhand smoke.
	Did Big Tobacco Deliberately Withhold Election Expenses in Boulder? - http://www.gaspforair.org/gasp/gedc/artcl-new.php?ID=75 From GASP of Colorado Education Center, summary of evidence that the tobacco industry was funding and organizing opposition to a Boulder smoke free ordinance.
	The Tobacco Industry and Ventilation - http://www.gaspforair.org/gasp/gedc/artcl-new.php?ID=94 Short history from GASP of Colorado Education Center.

	Organizations: FOREST - http://tobaccodocuments.org/profiles/forest.html Covers tobacco industry origins and purposes of FOREST.
	UICC GLOBALink ETS Documents - http://www.globalink.org/tobacco/docs/ets/Welcome.shtml Several documents, primarily about tobacco industry actions attempting to discredit the effects of secondhand smoke.
	National Toxicology Program, Board of Scientific Counselors - http://ntp.niehs.nih.gov/index.cfm?objectid=06F3F9F7-0DEB-D47E-C4A683A074666360 National scientific organization concludes unanimously that secondhand smoke is a known human carcinogen; the tobacco industry sends 10 witnesses to argue the other way.
	Stanton Glantz: Post-OSHA Hearings Comments - http://www.tobacco.org/Documents/osha/oshapost.html Post-OSHA Hearings Comments, 1996. Extensive analysis of tobacco industry arguments; sections on credibility and causality, publication bias, confounding variables, and misclassification error.
	Timeline: Tobacco Industry Actions on Secondhand Smoke - http://www.tobaccodocuments.org/index.cfm?menuitem=timelines&id=36 Traces industry actions from 1977 to the present, including recruiting scientists, influencing media, and PR campaigns.

Help build the largest human-edited directory on the web.

Submit a Site - Open Directory Project - Become an Editor

Modified by Google - ©2009 Google
Advertise with Us - Jobs, Press, Cool Stuff...